<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Aiming To Charge for RSS If Patent Goes Through?  Not a Chance.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pulse2.com/2006/12/28/microsoft-aiming-to-charge-for-rss-if-patent-goes-through-not-a-chance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pulse2.com/2006/12/28/microsoft-aiming-to-charge-for-rss-if-patent-goes-through-not-a-chance/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:47:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Aiming To Charge for RSS If Patent Goes Through? Not a Chance. &#171; Universe_JDJ&#8217;s News Blog</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2006/12/28/microsoft-aiming-to-charge-for-rss-if-patent-goes-through-not-a-chance/comment-page-1/#comment-3495</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Aiming To Charge for RSS If Patent Goes Through? Not a Chance. &#171; Universe_JDJ&#8217;s News Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/2006/12/28/microsoft-aiming-to-charge-for-rss-if-patent-goes-through-not-a-chance/#comment-3495</guid>
		<description>[...] read more&#160;&#124;&#160;digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more&nbsp;|&nbsp;digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
