<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg Profile Rankings Completely Deleted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pulse2.com/2007/02/05/digg-profile-rankings-completely-deleted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pulse2.com/2007/02/05/digg-profile-rankings-completely-deleted/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:01:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2007/02/05/digg-profile-rankings-completely-deleted/#comment-7368</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 23:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/2007/02/05/digg-profile-rankings-completely-deleted/#comment-7368</guid>
		<description>i think this will stop marketers from calling the top diggers and wanting to pay them. but, some of the underhanded â€pay for diggsâ€ tricks will still happenâ€¦

for instance, I read today in the comments of techcrunch that the top digg user â€webtechâ€ gets her site mentioned on techcrunch in reward for submiting as many techcrunch stories as she canâ€¦

http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/05/web-20-directory-go2web20-upgraded/

here is another story about itâ€¦

http://michaelarringtonsucks.com/2007/02/05/does-michael-arrington-trade-traffic-for-favors

now that nobody knows who the top diggers are, but they are still powerful, it will be easier for them to exchange their power for money or favors. to stop people like webtech and techcrunch from forcing stories to the frontpage, digg needs to change the friends systemâ€¦.

btw: i always wondered why there were so many techcrunch stories on digg. now i know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think this will stop marketers from calling the top diggers and wanting to pay them. but, some of the underhanded â€pay for diggsâ€ tricks will still happenâ€¦</p>
<p>for instance, I read today in the comments of techcrunch that the top digg user â€webtechâ€ gets her site mentioned on techcrunch in reward for submiting as many techcrunch stories as she canâ€¦</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/05/web-20-directory-go2web20-upgraded/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/02/05/web-20-directory-go2web20-upgraded/</a></p>
<p>here is another story about itâ€¦</p>
<p><a href="http://michaelarringtonsucks.com/2007/02/05/does-michael-arrington-trade-traffic-for-favors" rel="nofollow">http://michaelarringtonsucks.com/2007/02/05/does-michael-arrington-trade-traffic-for-favors</a></p>
<p>now that nobody knows who the top diggers are, but they are still powerful, it will be easier for them to exchange their power for money or favors. to stop people like webtech and techcrunch from forcing stories to the frontpage, digg needs to change the friends systemâ€¦.</p>
<p>btw: i always wondered why there were so many techcrunch stories on digg. now i know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

