<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: History Of The Web: Part 1 (Apple, Google, Yahoo!, Netscape, Microsoft, Digg)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pulse2.com/2008/01/21/history-of-the-web-part-1-apple-google-yahoo-netscape-microsoft-digg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/01/21/history-of-the-web-part-1-apple-google-yahoo-netscape-microsoft-digg/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:30:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zalpha</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/01/21/history-of-the-web-part-1-apple-google-yahoo-netscape-microsoft-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-30258</link>
		<dc:creator>Zalpha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/2008/01/21/history-of-the-web-part-1-apple-google-yahoo-netscape-microsoft-digg/#comment-30258</guid>
		<description>Why not go back to the actual beginning of the web instead of when it was six years old?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not go back to the actual beginning of the web instead of when it was six years old?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/01/21/history-of-the-web-part-1-apple-google-yahoo-netscape-microsoft-digg/comment-page-1/#comment-28157</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/2008/01/21/history-of-the-web-part-1-apple-google-yahoo-netscape-microsoft-digg/#comment-28157</guid>
		<description>The digg.com from 1998 is a different digg than the social media giant of today.
Today&#039;s digg wasn&#039;t started until the end of &#039;04
The site from 1998 appears to be the website of a record company, however I can&#039;t verify this, because it appears that the site was down every time the wayback machine archived it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The digg.com from 1998 is a different digg than the social media giant of today.<br />
Today&#8217;s digg wasn&#8217;t started until the end of &#8216;04<br />
The site from 1998 appears to be the website of a record company, however I can&#8217;t verify this, because it appears that the site was down every time the wayback machine archived it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
