<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo! Hits Icahn Below The Belt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pulse2.com/2008/07/18/yahoo-hits-icahn-below-the-belt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/07/18/yahoo-hits-icahn-below-the-belt/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 12:58:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo! Removes Icahn Banner From Homepage &#38; Settles On A Deal</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/07/18/yahoo-hits-icahn-below-the-belt/#comment-14187</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo! Removes Icahn Banner From Homepage &#38; Settles On A Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=3945#comment-14187</guid>
		<description>[...] in the meantime, Yahoo! has removed the banner that they placed on the homepage that made Icahn look bad.  addthis_url = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the meantime, Yahoo! has removed the banner that they placed on the homepage that made Icahn look bad.  addthis_url = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suehappy is right</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/07/18/yahoo-hits-icahn-below-the-belt/#comment-14140</link>
		<dc:creator>suehappy is right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=3945#comment-14140</guid>
		<description>yang is just a bad ceo.  he was worse than semel.  semel got fired because he couldnt compete with google and yang gets to stay just because he allowed the google to pimp their ads on yahoo... it just doesn&#039;t make sense</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yang is just a bad ceo.  he was worse than semel.  semel got fired because he couldnt compete with google and yang gets to stay just because he allowed the google to pimp their ads on yahoo&#8230; it just doesn&#8217;t make sense</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff L.</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/07/18/yahoo-hits-icahn-below-the-belt/#comment-14139</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=3945#comment-14139</guid>
		<description>Jerry, I love the &quot;Icahn&#039;s recent involvement with public companies&quot; slide. Its poor quality and irrelevance reminds me of Yahoo&#039;s products and your own career. Still, i guess it is nice propaganda that will be believed by any shareholder who owns Yahoo stock for the long run.

I do have a few problems with it. First off, the market has declined significantly since Icahn invested in many of these companies. Since January 2007 (the midpoint of the listed involvements), the S&amp;P 500 is down over %10. If a more appropriate proxy was used, Icahn&#039;s relative performance wouldn&#039;t look nearly as bad. Among the public companies listed are financial service firms, real estate developers, and highly levered firms. Now, considering today&#039;s real estate market and credit crunch, can we attribute these stock prices to Icahn&#039;s involvement? I don&#039;t think so! Finally, as some one mentioned before, Carl deals with mismanaged troubled companies. In hard times, these companies are hit the worst and ultimately take years to be turned around.

Another problem is that the percentages listed do not take into account any distributions made to shareholders. These include regular dividends, some very significant special dividends and spin-offs. For example, Temple Island paid a special dividend of $12.36 (41% yield) on Dec. 31, 2007. Just taking this one dividend into account, shareholders are roughly even since the time of Icahn&#039;s involvement.

Finally, the slide gives little credit to the opportunities Icahn&#039;s involvement gave to shareholders. Carl&#039;s $36 buyout offer for Lear is 60% higher than today&#039;s share price. Similarly, WCI Communities shareholder&#039;s could have garnered $22 a share for their stock. Its worth $1.26 today!

Yahoo has gone to a new low with this garbage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry, I love the &#8220;Icahn&#8217;s recent involvement with public companies&#8221; slide. Its poor quality and irrelevance reminds me of Yahoo&#8217;s products and your own career. Still, i guess it is nice propaganda that will be believed by any shareholder who owns Yahoo stock for the long run.</p>
<p>I do have a few problems with it. First off, the market has declined significantly since Icahn invested in many of these companies. Since January 2007 (the midpoint of the listed involvements), the S&amp;P 500 is down over %10. If a more appropriate proxy was used, Icahn&#8217;s relative performance wouldn&#8217;t look nearly as bad. Among the public companies listed are financial service firms, real estate developers, and highly levered firms. Now, considering today&#8217;s real estate market and credit crunch, can we attribute these stock prices to Icahn&#8217;s involvement? I don&#8217;t think so! Finally, as some one mentioned before, Carl deals with mismanaged troubled companies. In hard times, these companies are hit the worst and ultimately take years to be turned around.</p>
<p>Another problem is that the percentages listed do not take into account any distributions made to shareholders. These include regular dividends, some very significant special dividends and spin-offs. For example, Temple Island paid a special dividend of $12.36 (41% yield) on Dec. 31, 2007. Just taking this one dividend into account, shareholders are roughly even since the time of Icahn&#8217;s involvement.</p>
<p>Finally, the slide gives little credit to the opportunities Icahn&#8217;s involvement gave to shareholders. Carl&#8217;s $36 buyout offer for Lear is 60% higher than today&#8217;s share price. Similarly, WCI Communities shareholder&#8217;s could have garnered $22 a share for their stock. Its worth $1.26 today!</p>
<p>Yahoo has gone to a new low with this garbage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suehappy</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/07/18/yahoo-hits-icahn-below-the-belt/#comment-14138</link>
		<dc:creator>suehappy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=3945#comment-14138</guid>
		<description>when Y! voters make the mistake of sticking with Yang, there will be massive shareholder lawsuits against the company.  Yang and Co. made a huge mistake not selling the business. It isn&#039;t Yang&#039;s anymore.  It belongs to shareholders, who have a single goal of earning higher returns.  If Yang&#039;s slate stays, start shorting the stock because it will end up being closer to a $15 stock than a $30 stock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when Y! voters make the mistake of sticking with Yang, there will be massive shareholder lawsuits against the company.  Yang and Co. made a huge mistake not selling the business. It isn&#8217;t Yang&#8217;s anymore.  It belongs to shareholders, who have a single goal of earning higher returns.  If Yang&#8217;s slate stays, start shorting the stock because it will end up being closer to a $15 stock than a $30 stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/07/18/yahoo-hits-icahn-below-the-belt/#comment-14137</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 21:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=3945#comment-14137</guid>
		<description>Fight the man Yahoo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fight the man Yahoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vikash Shah</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/07/18/yahoo-hits-icahn-below-the-belt/#comment-14135</link>
		<dc:creator>Vikash Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=3945#comment-14135</guid>
		<description>All that has gone on with Yahoo! in the past few months, I can say that I kind of appreciate the aggressive nature with putting a story on their front page.  I mean they are taking out ALL the stops to save this company, and this is yet another example of how they don&#039;t want to be dominated by investors like Carl Icahn or companies that may not respect them (ie. Microsoft).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All that has gone on with Yahoo! in the past few months, I can say that I kind of appreciate the aggressive nature with putting a story on their front page.  I mean they are taking out ALL the stops to save this company, and this is yet another example of how they don&#8217;t want to be dominated by investors like Carl Icahn or companies that may not respect them (ie. Microsoft).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

