<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Launches Knol, A Hub For Articles Written By Credible Sources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pulse2.com/2008/07/23/google-launches-knol-a-hub-for-articles-written-by-credible-sources/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/07/23/google-launches-knol-a-hub-for-articles-written-by-credible-sources/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:47:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vikash Shah</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/07/23/google-launches-knol-a-hub-for-articles-written-by-credible-sources/comment-page-1/#comment-14315</link>
		<dc:creator>Vikash Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=4026#comment-14315</guid>
		<description>1)  Personally the body of information of the knol is cleaner then wikipedia.
2)  The top half of a knol doesn&#039;t even look that nice.
3)  I personally LOVE the fact you can actually see who has created the article.  

What do you guys think about the interface and the differences between knol and wikipedia?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1)  Personally the body of information of the knol is cleaner then wikipedia.<br />
2)  The top half of a knol doesn&#8217;t even look that nice.<br />
3)  I personally LOVE the fact you can actually see who has created the article.  </p>
<p>What do you guys think about the interface and the differences between knol and wikipedia?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
