<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Researchers Working On BrowseRank To Compete With Google PageRank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pulse2.com/2008/07/25/microsoft-researchers-working-on-browserank-to-compete-with-google-pagerank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/07/25/microsoft-researchers-working-on-browserank-to-compete-with-google-pagerank/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:47:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vikash Shah</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/07/25/microsoft-researchers-working-on-browserank-to-compete-with-google-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-14352</link>
		<dc:creator>Vikash Shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=4058#comment-14352</guid>
		<description>gfigg - Just checked our your website and I have to admit the idea sounds pretty novel.  It seems there is going to be several ways to &quot;complete&quot; a search and each method has its ups and downs.  There will probably be a paper that comes out from google that destroys browserank.  

I believe the group that is going to win is the website with the &quot;community&quot; (google is their one product).  Google has created such a large community that its user are going to be loyal, and if there is a better website google will probably imitate or buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gfigg &#8211; Just checked our your website and I have to admit the idea sounds pretty novel.  It seems there is going to be several ways to &#8220;complete&#8221; a search and each method has its ups and downs.  There will probably be a paper that comes out from google that destroys browserank.  </p>
<p>I believe the group that is going to win is the website with the &#8220;community&#8221; (google is their one product).  Google has created such a large community that its user are going to be loyal, and if there is a better website google will probably imitate or buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gfigg</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/07/25/microsoft-researchers-working-on-browserank-to-compete-with-google-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-14334</link>
		<dc:creator>gfigg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=4058#comment-14334</guid>
		<description>Very interesting, although this has been tried before.  DirectHit had a search engine built entirely on clickstream data (Acquired by Ask.com in 2000).  They got the data from ISPs in those days.  The end-result is really not that much better than Page-Rank.  

We at Me.dium on the other hand (http://me.dium.com/search) are processing our user&#039;s clickstream data in real-time to create a different lens based on what&#039;s going on now.  e.g. do a search for John Edwards on Google or Live, and you get johnedwards.com and wiki/johnedwards.  Do the same search on Me.dium and you learn that today people care about his love child, pictures of his mistress, etc.

The difference is real-time (what people are browsing now) vs. historical (what they browsed in the past).  Social vs. Old School.  Check it out and let us know your thoughts.  http://me.dium.com/search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting, although this has been tried before.  DirectHit had a search engine built entirely on clickstream data (Acquired by Ask.com in 2000).  They got the data from ISPs in those days.  The end-result is really not that much better than Page-Rank.  </p>
<p>We at Me.dium on the other hand (<a href="http://me.dium.com/search" rel="nofollow">http://me.dium.com/search</a>) are processing our user&#8217;s clickstream data in real-time to create a different lens based on what&#8217;s going on now.  e.g. do a search for John Edwards on Google or Live, and you get johnedwards.com and wiki/johnedwards.  Do the same search on Me.dium and you learn that today people care about his love child, pictures of his mistress, etc.</p>
<p>The difference is real-time (what people are browsing now) vs. historical (what they browsed in the past).  Social vs. Old School.  Check it out and let us know your thoughts.  <a href="http://me.dium.com/search." rel="nofollow">http://me.dium.com/search.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
