<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Engine, Cuil Just Might Be The Next Big Thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pulse2.com/2008/07/28/search-engine-cuil-just-might-be-the-next-big-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/07/28/search-engine-cuil-just-might-be-the-next-big-thing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 12:58:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Buys Cuil&#8217;s Patent Applications &#124; Pulse2 Technology and Social Media News</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/07/28/search-engine-cuil-just-might-be-the-next-big-thing/#comment-60083</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Buys Cuil&#8217;s Patent Applications &#124; Pulse2 Technology and Social Media News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=4091#comment-60083</guid>
		<description>[...] engineers and that they had an index that was supposedly much larger than the size of Google. Cuil raised $33 million between two rounds of funding. They completely lost their buzz in 2008 and I wrote about them one more time in 2010 when their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] engineers and that they had an index that was supposedly much larger than the size of Google. Cuil raised $33 million between two rounds of funding. They completely lost their buzz in 2008 and I wrote about them one more time in 2010 when their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richrelevance Raises $12.5 Million</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/07/28/search-engine-cuil-just-might-be-the-next-big-thing/#comment-28282</link>
		<dc:creator>Richrelevance Raises $12.5 Million</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 04:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=4091#comment-28282</guid>
		<description>[...] between Tugboat and Greylock, the Cuil search engine was involved.  That search engine was quickly hyped up and forgotten about despite a $200 million valuation.  Hopefully Greylock and Tugboat have better [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] between Tugboat and Greylock, the Cuil search engine was involved.  That search engine was quickly hyped up and forgotten about despite a $200 million valuation.  Hopefully Greylock and Tugboat have better [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit Chowdhry</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/07/28/search-engine-cuil-just-might-be-the-next-big-thing/#comment-14382</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit Chowdhry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=4091#comment-14382</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure that the next thing on Cuil&#039;s agenda is to make their search algorithm stronger in finding results.  And then comes the revenue model to keep them afloat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure that the next thing on Cuil&#8217;s agenda is to make their search algorithm stronger in finding results.  And then comes the revenue model to keep them afloat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Snell</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2008/07/28/search-engine-cuil-just-might-be-the-next-big-thing/#comment-14381</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Snell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=4091#comment-14381</guid>
		<description>I think Cuil totally missed the mark and managed to blunder their own launch with a product that does&#039;t live up to any of the hype.

The search results are off the mark, irrelevant in most cases and really all Cuil managed to do was build a large repository of data that cant be searched very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Cuil totally missed the mark and managed to blunder their own launch with a product that does&#8217;t live up to any of the hype.</p>
<p>The search results are off the mark, irrelevant in most cases and really all Cuil managed to do was build a large repository of data that cant be searched very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

