<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jammie Thomas Found Liable For Copyright Infringement With $1.92 Million Penalty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pulse2.com/2009/06/19/jammie-thomas-found-liable-for-copyright-infringement-with-192-million-penalty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pulse2.com/2009/06/19/jammie-thomas-found-liable-for-copyright-infringement-with-192-million-penalty/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:51:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jammie Thomas Lawyers Pursuing Lower Music Industry Damage Reward</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2009/06/19/jammie-thomas-found-liable-for-copyright-infringement-with-192-million-penalty/comment-page-1/#comment-29184</link>
		<dc:creator>Jammie Thomas Lawyers Pursuing Lower Music Industry Damage Reward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 03:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=16788#comment-29184</guid>
		<description>[...] June 2009, a judge ruled that Jammie Thomas would have to pay $1.92 million to the music industry based on 24 acts of copyright infringement.  &#8220;It would be unconstitutional to punish Mrs. Thomas for the generalized and widespread [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] June 2009, a judge ruled that Jammie Thomas would have to pay $1.92 million to the music industry based on 24 acts of copyright infringement.  &#8220;It would be unconstitutional to punish Mrs. Thomas for the generalized and widespread [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ashes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Richard Marx Makes Statement Defending Jammie Thomas</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2009/06/19/jammie-thomas-found-liable-for-copyright-infringement-with-192-million-penalty/comment-page-1/#comment-27687</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ashes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Richard Marx Makes Statement Defending Jammie Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=16788#comment-27687</guid>
		<description>[...] statement defending Jammie Thomas.  Thomas is the Minnesota resident that was sued by the RIAA and lost in court, penalizing her $1.92 million.  Below is the statement from Marx: As a longtime professional [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] statement defending Jammie Thomas.  Thomas is the Minnesota resident that was sued by the RIAA and lost in court, penalizing her $1.92 million.  Below is the statement from Marx: As a longtime professional [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Marx Makes Statement Defending Jammie Thomas</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2009/06/19/jammie-thomas-found-liable-for-copyright-infringement-with-192-million-penalty/comment-page-1/#comment-27658</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Marx Makes Statement Defending Jammie Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 06:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=16788#comment-27658</guid>
		<description>[...] statement defending Jammie Thomas.  Thomas is the Minnesota resident that was sued by the RIAA and lost in court, penalizing her $1.92 million.  Below is the statement from Marx: As a longtime professional [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] statement defending Jammie Thomas.  Thomas is the Minnesota resident that was sued by the RIAA and lost in court, penalizing her $1.92 million.  Below is the statement from Marx: As a longtime professional [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikhil Chaudhri</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2009/06/19/jammie-thomas-found-liable-for-copyright-infringement-with-192-million-penalty/comment-page-1/#comment-27611</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikhil Chaudhri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=16788#comment-27611</guid>
		<description>Yea this stuff is such BS. I know someone who got in trouble for copyright infringement once for a book and settled the $40,000 claim for $50.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea this stuff is such BS. I know someone who got in trouble for copyright infringement once for a book and settled the $40,000 claim for $50.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
