<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Natalie Blanchard Loses Health Insurance For Not Appearing Depressed On Facebook Pictures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pulse2.com/2009/11/23/natalie-blanchard-loses-health-insurance-for-not-appearing-depressed-on-facebook-pictures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pulse2.com/2009/11/23/natalie-blanchard-loses-health-insurance-for-not-appearing-depressed-on-facebook-pictures/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 10:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgs</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2009/11/23/natalie-blanchard-loses-health-insurance-for-not-appearing-depressed-on-facebook-pictures/#comment-59584</link>
		<dc:creator>tgs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 06:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=22538#comment-59584</guid>
		<description>Wow! you should open up a practice or something, seeing as you have the ability to diagnose mental illness or lack thereof by just reading stories on the internet. You are effing amazing!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! you should open up a practice or something, seeing as you have the ability to diagnose mental illness or lack thereof by just reading stories on the internet. You are effing amazing!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Use Social Networking Sites With Caution: You Never Know Who's Looking &#124; Church Wyble Blog</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2009/11/23/natalie-blanchard-loses-health-insurance-for-not-appearing-depressed-on-facebook-pictures/#comment-49514</link>
		<dc:creator>Use Social Networking Sites With Caution: You Never Know Who's Looking &#124; Church Wyble Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=22538#comment-49514</guid>
		<description>[...] of our lives online through social networking sites such as Facebook, Myspace, and Twitter, Natalie Blanchard hardly realized that her seemingly innocent Facebook photos would change her life as much as they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of our lives online through social networking sites such as Facebook, Myspace, and Twitter, Natalie Blanchard hardly realized that her seemingly innocent Facebook photos would change her life as much as they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jane</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2009/11/23/natalie-blanchard-loses-health-insurance-for-not-appearing-depressed-on-facebook-pictures/#comment-35882</link>
		<dc:creator>jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 03:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=22538#comment-35882</guid>
		<description>good...she should have to repay all the money</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good&#8230;she should have to repay all the money</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corporate trolling on employees’ Facebook pages &#124; Blunt - The Conversation Agency</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2009/11/23/natalie-blanchard-loses-health-insurance-for-not-appearing-depressed-on-facebook-pictures/#comment-30548</link>
		<dc:creator>Corporate trolling on employees’ Facebook pages &#124; Blunt - The Conversation Agency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=22538#comment-30548</guid>
		<description>[...] now, I’m sure that many of you have heard the unfortunate story of Natalie Blanchard. The 29 year-old IBM employee from Bromont, Quebec, who had taken sick leave [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now, I’m sure that many of you have heard the unfortunate story of Natalie Blanchard. The 29 year-old IBM employee from Bromont, Quebec, who had taken sick leave [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lofa</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2009/11/23/natalie-blanchard-loses-health-insurance-for-not-appearing-depressed-on-facebook-pictures/#comment-31064</link>
		<dc:creator>lofa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=22538#comment-31064</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read several news articles and researched for additional details before coming to a conclusion.I&#039;m sorry to say this, but it sounds like to me that this woman is just lazy. Anyone who really had a depression [or other mental] problem would NOT be posting photos on facebook, much less continuing to post photos on facebook. This whole &quot;I have a depression problem&quot; is just one that ANYONE can fake.Now as for the argument of how facebook profiles should have been locked and private... there is NO such thing as keeping things &quot;safe&quot; and locked on the net. ANYTHING that gets posted or sent [yes that includes EMAIL] through the net STAYS on the net. I&#039;ve known this simple FACT for years.As for the insurance company being &quot;in the wrong&quot; to snoop and discontinue her benefits... I&#039;m sorry, but they have every right to know if someone is handing them a line a sh!t just to get free money out of the deal. There ARE people out there who REALLY do need and deserve to have health insurance, but don&#039;t get it because of individuals like this woman who make it bad for everyone else. I commend the insurance company for buckling down and I wish that other leeching individuals would get caught and cut off too.Bottom line: it doesn&#039;t pay to be a thief, liar, lazy, money moocher. Let this be a lesson for anyone who thinks it&#039;s ok to suck on the system while others pay their hard earned money for it. IBM would be wise to not allow the woman to come back to the job. Instead, they should tell her to take a hike, as this story I&#039;m sure will have some sort of bad reflection on the corporation. If this woman is capable of going to a beach weekly and capable of going to night clubs to see male dancers, then she&#039;s most certainly capable of working a normal job like a normal human being.Don&#039;t feel sorry for con artists. They&#039;re good at sucking people dry of their money. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve read several news articles and researched for additional details before coming to a conclusion.I&#039;m sorry to say this, but it sounds like to me that this woman is just lazy. Anyone who really had a depression [or other mental] problem would NOT be posting photos on facebook, much less continuing to post photos on facebook. This whole &quot;I have a depression problem&quot; is just one that ANYONE can fake.Now as for the argument of how facebook profiles should have been locked and private&#8230; there is NO such thing as keeping things &quot;safe&quot; and locked on the net. ANYTHING that gets posted or sent [yes that includes EMAIL] through the net STAYS on the net. I&#039;ve known this simple FACT for years.As for the insurance company being &quot;in the wrong&quot; to snoop and discontinue her benefits&#8230; I&#039;m sorry, but they have every right to know if someone is handing them a line a sh!t just to get free money out of the deal. There ARE people out there who REALLY do need and deserve to have health insurance, but don&#039;t get it because of individuals like this woman who make it bad for everyone else. I commend the insurance company for buckling down and I wish that other leeching individuals would get caught and cut off too.Bottom line: it doesn&#039;t pay to be a thief, liar, lazy, money moocher. Let this be a lesson for anyone who thinks it&#039;s ok to suck on the system while others pay their hard earned money for it. IBM would be wise to not allow the woman to come back to the job. Instead, they should tell her to take a hike, as this story I&#039;m sure will have some sort of bad reflection on the corporation. If this woman is capable of going to a beach weekly and capable of going to night clubs to see male dancers, then she&#039;s most certainly capable of working a normal job like a normal human being.Don&#039;t feel sorry for con artists. They&#039;re good at sucking people dry of their money. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lofa</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2009/11/23/natalie-blanchard-loses-health-insurance-for-not-appearing-depressed-on-facebook-pictures/#comment-30545</link>
		<dc:creator>lofa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=22538#comment-30545</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read several news articles and researched for additional details before coming to a conclusion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m sorry to say this, but it sounds like to me that this woman is just lazy. Anyone who really had a depression [or other mental] problem would NOT be posting photos on facebook, much less continuing to post photos on facebook. This whole &quot;I have a depression problem&quot; is just one that ANYONE can fake.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now as for the argument of how facebook profiles should have been locked and private... there is NO such thing as keeping things &quot;safe&quot; and locked on the net. ANYTHING that gets posted or sent [yes that includes EMAIL] through the net STAYS on the net. I&#039;ve known this simple FACT for years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the insurance company being &quot;in the wrong&quot; to snoop and discontinue her benefits... I&#039;m sorry, but they have every right to know if someone is handing them a line a sh!t just to get free money out of the deal. There ARE people out there who REALLY do need and deserve to have health insurance, but don&#039;t get it because of individuals like this woman who make it bad for everyone else. I commend the insurance company for buckling down and I wish that other leeching individuals would get caught and cut off too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bottom line: it doesn&#039;t pay to be a thief, liar, lazy, money moocher. Let this be a lesson for anyone who thinks it&#039;s ok to suck on the system while others pay their hard earned money for it. IBM would be wise to not allow the woman to come back to the job. Instead, they should tell her to take a hike, as this story I&#039;m sure will have some sort of bad reflection on the corporation. If this woman is capable of going to a beach weekly and capable of going to night clubs to see male dancers, then she&#039;s most certainly capable of working a normal job like a normal human being.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don&#039;t feel sorry for con artists. They&#039;re good at sucking people dry of their money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve read several news articles and researched for additional details before coming to a conclusion.</p>
<p>I&#39;m sorry to say this, but it sounds like to me that this woman is just lazy. Anyone who really had a depression [or other mental] problem would NOT be posting photos on facebook, much less continuing to post photos on facebook. This whole &#8220;I have a depression problem&#8221; is just one that ANYONE can fake.</p>
<p>Now as for the argument of how facebook profiles should have been locked and private&#8230; there is NO such thing as keeping things &#8220;safe&#8221; and locked on the net. ANYTHING that gets posted or sent [yes that includes EMAIL] through the net STAYS on the net. I&#39;ve known this simple FACT for years.</p>
<p>As for the insurance company being &#8220;in the wrong&#8221; to snoop and discontinue her benefits&#8230; I&#39;m sorry, but they have every right to know if someone is handing them a line a sh!t just to get free money out of the deal. There ARE people out there who REALLY do need and deserve to have health insurance, but don&#39;t get it because of individuals like this woman who make it bad for everyone else. I commend the insurance company for buckling down and I wish that other leeching individuals would get caught and cut off too.</p>
<p>Bottom line: it doesn&#39;t pay to be a thief, liar, lazy, money moocher. Let this be a lesson for anyone who thinks it&#39;s ok to suck on the system while others pay their hard earned money for it. IBM would be wise to not allow the woman to come back to the job. Instead, they should tell her to take a hike, as this story I&#39;m sure will have some sort of bad reflection on the corporation. If this woman is capable of going to a beach weekly and capable of going to night clubs to see male dancers, then she&#39;s most certainly capable of working a normal job like a normal human being.</p>
<p>Don&#39;t feel sorry for con artists. They&#39;re good at sucking people dry of their money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gaba</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2009/11/23/natalie-blanchard-loses-health-insurance-for-not-appearing-depressed-on-facebook-pictures/#comment-30538</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gaba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=22538#comment-30538</guid>
		<description>what a stupid insurance company...If you are dealing with depression Who the F would show pictures of them looking depressed...everybody knows people only show what they want people to see on facebook</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a stupid insurance company&#8230;If you are dealing with depression Who the F would show pictures of them looking depressed&#8230;everybody knows people only show what they want people to see on facebook</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

