<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pulse2 Technology and Social Media News &#187; European Union</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pulse2.com/category/european-union/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pulse2.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 17:08:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>European Union Court Deciding Microsoft Fine On June 27</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2012/05/24/european-union-court-deciding-microsoft-fine-on-june-27/</link>
		<comments>http://pulse2.com/2012/05/24/european-union-court-deciding-microsoft-fine-on-june-27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit Chowdhry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[p2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Corporation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=61798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The European Union is set to rule whether the 899 million euros ($1.1 billion) fine on Microsoft four years ago was justified on June 27. Microsoft was fined for failing to comply with an antitrust ruling intended to make business &#8230; <a href="http://pulse2.com/2012/05/24/european-union-court-deciding-microsoft-fine-on-june-27/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://mediaserver.pulse2.com/uploads/2011/09/Screen-shot-2011-09-14-at-1.21.26-PM-e1316020865826.png" title="Microsoft Logo" class="alignnone" width="200" height="42" /><br />
The European Union is set to rule whether the 899 million euros ($1.1 billion) fine on Microsoft four years ago was justified on <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/120524/p19#a120524p19">June 27</a>.  Microsoft was fined for failing to comply with an antitrust ruling intended to make business easier for rivals.  Supposedly Microsoft had failed to provide information to firms with competing products as ordered by an EU watchdog in 2004.  The General Court of the EU regulator for non-compliance in Luxembourg will issue a ruling next month.  Microsoft lawyers argued during a court hearing that the fine was excessive and undeserved.  A Commission lawyer compared Microsoft to a gambler that lost a bet and wanted their money back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pulse2.com/2012/05/24/european-union-court-deciding-microsoft-fine-on-june-27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Files Complaint With EU Accusing Motorola Of Violating Fair Terms On Patents</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2012/02/18/apple-files-complaint-with-eu-accusing-motorola-of-violating-fair-terms-on-patents/</link>
		<comments>http://pulse2.com/2012/02/18/apple-files-complaint-with-eu-accusing-motorola-of-violating-fair-terms-on-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit Chowdhry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[p2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Erickson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola Mobility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=56712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Motorola Mobility said that Apple has filed a complaint with the European Union against them accusing the company of violating a pledge to license industry-standard patents on fair terms. Motorola was notified about the complaint by the European Commission. However &#8230; <a href="http://pulse2.com/2012/02/18/apple-files-complaint-with-eu-accusing-motorola-of-violating-fair-terms-on-patents/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://mediaserver.pulse2.com/uploads/2011/10/apple-logo.png" title="Apple Logo" class="alignnone" width="174" height="217" /><br />
Motorola Mobility said that Apple has <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-02-17/apple-files-competition-claim-against-motorola-mobility.html">filed a complaint</a> with the European Union against them accusing the company of violating a pledge to license industry-standard patents on fair terms.  Motorola was notified about the complaint by the European Commission.  However Motorola Mobility spokeswoman Jennifer Erickson said that the company is willing to negotiate a patent license with Apple.<br />
<span id="more-56712"></span><br />
Apple and Motorola Mobility have been suing each other in the U.S. and Europe over the technology used in smartphones.  Motorola&#8217;s lawsuit against Apple is requesting 2.25% royalties of iPhones being sold.  Motorola Mobility has won two out of three rulings in lawsuits they filed against Apple in Mannheim, Germany.  In one case, Apple had to remove older iPhones and iPad models from their online store in Germany.</p>
<p>“MMI has a long-standing practice of licensing our patents on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and we offered those to Apple,” stated Erickson.  Google is acquiring Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pulse2.com/2012/02/18/apple-files-complaint-with-eu-accusing-motorola-of-violating-fair-terms-on-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Union Temporarily Halts Motorola Mobility Merger Review</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2011/12/12/european-union-temporarily-halts-motorola-mobility-merger-review/</link>
		<comments>http://pulse2.com/2011/12/12/european-union-temporarily-halts-motorola-mobility-merger-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit Chowdhry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[p2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola Mobility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=54423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The European Union has temporarily suspended antitrust review of Google&#8217;s acquisition of Motorola Mobility. The EU is requesting more information about the deal. Once the antitrust authority receives additional documentation, the review will continue. The deal is expected to closed &#8230; <a href="http://pulse2.com/2011/12/12/european-union-temporarily-halts-motorola-mobility-merger-review/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://mediaserver.pulse2.com/uploads/2011/08/motorola-mobility-logo-315x42.jpg" title="Motorola Mobility" class="alignnone" width="315" height="42" /><br />
The European Union has temporarily suspended antitrust review of Google&#8217;s acquisition of Motorola Mobility.  The EU is requesting more information about the deal.  Once the antitrust authority receives additional documentation, the review will continue.  The deal is expected to closed in 2012. [<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-12/eu-stops-clock-on-google-motorola-mobility-merger-review.html">Bloomberg</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pulse2.com/2011/12/12/european-union-temporarily-halts-motorola-mobility-merger-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Germany Calls Facebook&#8217;s Facial Recognition Illegal</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2011/08/04/germany-calls-facebooks-facial-recognition-illegal/</link>
		<comments>http://pulse2.com/2011/08/04/germany-calls-facebooks-facial-recognition-illegal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Riley Kennysmith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johannes Caspar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=49586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[German government officials have declared Facebook&#8217;s facial recognition technology illegal under German and EU data protection laws. The Atlantic Wire reports that data protection official Johannes Caspar said that with the facial recognition running, &#8220;the right to anonymity is in &#8230; <a href="http://pulse2.com/2011/08/04/germany-calls-facebooks-facial-recognition-illegal/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica} p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px} --><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-49587" src="http://mediaserver.pulse2.com/uploads/2011/08/facebook-logo2-315x126.jpg" alt="" width="315" height="126" /></p>
<p>German government officials have declared Facebook&#8217;s facial recognition technology illegal under German and EU data protection laws. <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2011/08/germanys-war-facebook/40771/">The Atlantic Wire</a> reports that data protection official Johannes Caspar said that with the facial recognition running, &#8220;the right to anonymity is in danger.&#8221; Germany has previously threatened legal action against Facebook for other privacy issues with events pages and the Friend Finder feature.</p>
<p><span id="more-49586"></span></p>
<p>German officials have given Facebook two weeks to respond to their complaint before legal action is taken agains theta company, which could result in fines up to half a million dollars. Facebook does not have a record of quick response to Germany&#8217;s past privacy complaints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pulse2.com/2011/08/04/germany-calls-facebooks-facial-recognition-illegal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Granted 24 iOS Icon Design Patents By European Union</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2011/03/18/apple-granted-24-ios-icon-design-patents-by-european-union/</link>
		<comments>http://pulse2.com/2011/03/18/apple-granted-24-ios-icon-design-patents-by-european-union/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit Chowdhry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=45057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) was given 24 iOS Design Patents that relates to various icons that includes utilities. The patent includes Apple icons like the calculator, iBooks, Numbers, World Clock, Mail, FaceTime, Camera, Rentina display, Messages, iTunes Store, and iMovie. [Patently &#8230; <a href="http://pulse2.com/2011/03/18/apple-granted-24-ios-icon-design-patents-by-european-union/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://mediaserver.pulse2.com/uploads/2011/03/Screen-shot-2011-03-18-at-3.19.15-PM-e1300475937196.png" alt="" title="Screen shot 2011-03-18 at 3.19.15 PM" width="600" height="244" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-45058" /><br />
Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) was given 24 iOS Design Patents that relates to various icons that includes utilities.  The patent includes Apple icons like the calculator, iBooks, Numbers, World Clock, Mail, FaceTime, Camera, Rentina display, Messages, iTunes Store, and iMovie.  [<a href="http://www.patentlyapple.com/patently-apple/2011/03/the-eu-grants-apple-24-ios-icon-design-patents.html">Patently Apple</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pulse2.com/2011/03/18/apple-granted-24-ios-icon-design-patents-by-european-union/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TripAdvisor, Yelp, CitySearch, and WebMD Not Thrilled By How Google Displays Links</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2010/12/13/tripadvisor-yelp-citysearch-and-webmd-not-thrilled-by-how-google-displays-links/</link>
		<comments>http://pulse2.com/2010/12/13/tripadvisor-yelp-citysearch-and-webmd-not-thrilled-by-how-google-displays-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit Chowdhry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citysearch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Herratti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TripAdvisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yelp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=39549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you search for a local venue, hotel, information about a city, or even a health condition on Google.com, you may find a result from Google.com itself at the very top. TripAdvisor, Yelp, CitySearch, and WebMD are not happy with &#8230; <a href="http://pulse2.com/2010/12/13/tripadvisor-yelp-citysearch-and-webmd-not-thrilled-by-how-google-displays-links/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://mediaserver.pulse2.com/uploads/2010/12/Screen-shot-2010-12-13-at-3.44.00-PM.png" alt="" title="Screen shot 2010-12-13 at 3.44.00 PM" width="620" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-39550" /><br />
When you search for a local venue, hotel, information about a city, or even a health condition on Google.com, you may find a result from Google.com itself at the very top.  TripAdvisor, Yelp, CitySearch, and WebMD are not happy with the way that the links are displayed.  With Google.com being the top result, it makes it even more of a challenge for the aforementioned websites to compete for ad revenue.<br />
<span id="more-39549"></span><br />
&#8220;There is no denying that today Google is competing [with many websites] for the same Web traffic and the same advertising dollars,&#8221; stated CityGrid CEO Jay Herratti.  Traffic to TripAdvisor.com has been dropped by about 10% on a seasonally adjusted basis since mid-October due to the shift in Google&#8217;s displayed links. These complaints also showcase how much Google search is important for almost every business online.  I can empathize with some of these businesses since about 55% of our visits are from search engines.</p>
<p>The European Union is now working on a formal investigation on whether Google is manipulating search results for their own advantage.  Google said that they have never intentionally intended to hurt competing services.  They also said that the complaints to the EU were led by companies with ties to Microsoft.</p>
<p>[<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704058704576015630188568972.html">WSJ</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pulse2.com/2010/12/13/tripadvisor-yelp-citysearch-and-webmd-not-thrilled-by-how-google-displays-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Union Orders Google To Delete Street View [LAME!]</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2010/02/27/european-union-orders-google-to-delete-street-view-lame/</link>
		<comments>http://pulse2.com/2010/02/27/european-union-orders-google-to-delete-street-view-lame/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit Chowdhry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[pulse2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Street View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viviane Reding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=26328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The European government recently brought an anti-trust case against Google and now they want them to delete the Google Street View service in Europe. Google Street View went live in the U.K. last year and allows map users to zoom &#8230; <a href="http://pulse2.com/2010/02/27/european-union-orders-google-to-delete-street-view-lame/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://mediaserver.pulse2.com/uploads/2010/02/Picture-426.png" alt="" title="Picture 4" width="106" height="81" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-26327" /><br />
The European government recently brought an anti-trust case against Google and now they want them to delete the Google Street View service in Europe. Google Street View went live in the U.K. last year and allows map users to zoom in to the street level.  One of the problems that people have with Street View is that some of the images that are captured by Street View may be incriminating.  </p>
<p>Apparently the European Union believes that this is a &#8220;data-protection&#8221; issue.  &#8220;I expect that all companies play according to the rules of the game,&#8221; stated EU Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding.</p>
<p>What I like best about Google Street View is that the service has captured some of the funniest pictures that I&#8217;ve ever seen.  Last month I put together a top 100 list of some of the best Google Street View pictures.  <a href="http://pulse2.com/2010/01/09/top-100-funniest-google-street-view-pictures/">Check &#8216;em out here</a>.<br />
 [<a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9162798/EU_orders_Google_to_ditch_Street_View_images_after_6_months">ComputerWorld</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pulse2.com/2010/02/27/european-union-orders-google-to-delete-street-view-lame/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEC Tells Intel That The Cubans Have Celeron Processors</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2009/08/12/sec-tells-intel-that-the-cubans-have-celeron-processors/</link>
		<comments>http://pulse2.com/2009/08/12/sec-tells-intel-that-the-cubans-have-celeron-processors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 05:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit Chowdhry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[pulse2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P. Nikiforos Diamandouros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Securities and Exchange Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=18641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel Corporation has been taking a bit of heat from the government lately, both domestic and abroad.  In May, the European Union fined Intel $1.45 billion over anti-competitive practices.  And two months ago Intel received a letter last week that &#8230; <a href="http://pulse2.com/2009/08/12/sec-tells-intel-that-the-cubans-have-celeron-processors/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" title="Intel Logo" src="http://mediaserver.pulse2.com/uploads/2009/04/intel-logo.png" alt="" width="400" height="264" /><br />
<strong>Intel Corporation has been taking a bit of heat from the government lately, both domestic and abroad.  In May, the European Union <a href="http://pulse2.com/2009/05/17/intel-may-face-civil-charges-following-145-billion-fine-from-european-union/">fined Intel $1.45 billion</a> over anti-competitive practices.  And two months ago Intel received a letter last week that PCs in Cuba contain Celeron processors even though there is an embargo.<br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Dealing with the European Union</strong><br />
Interestingly ombudsman P. Nikiforos Diamandouros criticized the EU for not recording the case file in the decision against the chipmaker.  And a Dell executive <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/hardware/processors/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=219100492&amp;subSection=All+Stories">cited AMD&#8217;s performance being poor</a> as the reason why the PC manufacturing company chose Intel as their supplier.  This makes the verdict of the decision to penalize Intel seem a bit off.  More details to follow as discussions arise on this topic.</p>
<p><strong>Dealing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</strong><br />
The SEC sent Intel a confidential letter on June 4th stating the following:<br />
&#8220;We are aware of a May 2008 news report that PCs in Cuba contain your Celeron processors. Cuba, Iran, Sudan, and Syria are identified by the State Department as state sponsors of terrorism, and are subject to U.S. economic sanctions and export controls.&#8221;</p>
<p>In addition, the SEC wrote &#8220;We note that your Form 10-K does not include disclosure regarding contacts with Cuba, Iran, Sudan, and Syria. Please describe to us the nature and extent of any past, current, and anticipated contacts with the referenced countries, whether through distributors, resellers, licensees, or other direct or indirect arrangements.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Cubans have PCs that have Intel Celeron processors with 80GB hard drives and 512MB of RAM.  They also have the Windows XP operating system.  Intel responded with the following letter:</p>
<p>&#8220;Intel has no business contacts with the Subject Countries, either directly or indirectly through tacit agreement with its customers. Intel does not provide products or technology to the Subject Countries&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>To be honest, perhaps it is a good thing that all the Celerons are ending up in Cuba.  They should even take computers marked with &#8220;dual-core&#8221; processors.  And let&#8217;s give the Americans more Core 2 Duos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pulse2.com/2009/08/12/sec-tells-intel-that-the-cubans-have-celeron-processors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia Claims Intel Has Unfair Pricing After EU Ruling</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2009/05/19/nvidia-claims-intel-has-unfair-pricing-after-eu-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://pulse2.com/2009/05/19/nvidia-claims-intel-has-unfair-pricing-after-eu-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 22:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit Chowdhry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[pulse2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Calder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jen-Hsun Huang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVIDIA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=15576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In less than a few days after Intel was fined for having unfair prices and for giving rebates to PC makers by the European Union, Nvidia decided to give their opinion on the chip maker company.  The European Union decided &#8230; <a href="http://pulse2.com/2009/05/19/nvidia-claims-intel-has-unfair-pricing-after-eu-ruling/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-15575" title="nvidia" src="http://mediaserver.pulse2.com/uploads/2009/05/nvidia.jpg" alt="nvidia" width="191" height="65" /><br />
<span style="color: #008000;"><strong>In less than a few days after <a href="http://pulse2.com/2009/05/17/intel-may-face-civil-charges-following-145-billion-fine-from-european-union/">Intel was fined</a> for having unfair prices and for giving rebates to PC makers by the European Union, Nvidia decided to give their opinion on the chip maker company.  The European Union decided to investigate Intel after AMD filed a report against them.</strong></span></p>
<p>Jen-Hsun Huang, the CEO of Nvidia said that Intel chip pricing was unfair but said that they are not planning to file an antitrust action lawsuit against Intel for now.  Intel sells Atom chips for $45 for a single unit, but sells three-chip sets for $25.  The extremely discounted price for bulk units lures customers away from AMD.  &#8220;That seems pretty unfair,&#8221; stated Huang. &#8220;We ought to be able to compete and serve that market.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;We compete fairly. We do not force bundles on any computer makers and customers can purchase Atom individually or as part of the bundle,&#8221; responded Intel spokesman Bill Calder. &#8220;If you want to purchase the chip set, obviously there is better pricing.&#8221;</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://ca.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idCATRE54H5OK20090518">Reuters</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pulse2.com/2009/05/19/nvidia-claims-intel-has-unfair-pricing-after-eu-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EU No Longer Monitoring Microsoft Full-Time</title>
		<link>http://pulse2.com/2009/03/04/eu-no-longer-monitoring-microsoft-full-time/</link>
		<comments>http://pulse2.com/2009/03/04/eu-no-longer-monitoring-microsoft-full-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amit Chowdhry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[pulse2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Barrett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pulse2.com/?p=11506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft&#8217;s favorite government agency the European Union is no longer watching over the software giant full-time.  The European Commission stated that they no longer need a full-time trustee to make sure Microsoft is obeying the EU&#8217;s antitrust orders.  Microsoft has &#8230; <a href="http://pulse2.com/2009/03/04/eu-no-longer-monitoring-microsoft-full-time/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft&#8217;s favorite government agency the European Union is no longer watching over the software giant full-time.  The European Commission stated that they no longer need a full-time trustee to make sure Microsoft is obeying the EU&#8217;s antitrust orders.  Microsoft has been sharing technical information with rivals that helps make their products compatible with Microsoft servers.</p>
<p>Neil Barrett, a computer science professor was appointed by the EU to assess Microsoft data.  Microsoft lost a legal battle in 2007 to the EU.  Microsoft had to give I.P. to rivals as a result.  Microsoft stated that they will remain committed to complying with the EU&#8217;s antitrust orders.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/ap/20090304/ap_on_hi_te/eu_eu_microsoft">AP</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pulse2.com/2009/03/04/eu-no-longer-monitoring-microsoft-full-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

